| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 2 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 0.00 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 0.00-0.00 (cM)
4.4-4.4 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | rs81364734 |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | SNP |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Experiment-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
FDR | 2.40E-02 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | PPP6R3 (protein phosphatase 6, regulatory subunit 3) |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #218205
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Pigs were from three backcross populations: (Iberian x Landrace) x Landrace, (Iberian x Duroc) x Duroc, and (Iberian x Pietrain) x Pietrain. |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | Animals were genotyped using either the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip or the Affymetrix Axiom Porcine Genotyping Array and analyzed for fatty acid composition in backfat and Longissimus dorsi. A total of 38,424 SNPs were used for analysis. |
| Analysis: | GWAS was performed using a univariate linear mixed model. |
| Software: | PLINK, GEMMA |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Crespo-Piazuelo D, Criado-Mesas L, Revilla M, Castelló A, Noguera JL, Fernández AI, Ballester M, Folch JM |
| Affiliation: | Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193, Bellaterra, Spain |
| Title: | Identification of strong candidate genes for backfat and intramuscular fatty acid composition in three crosses based on the Iberian pig |
| Journal: | Scientific reports, 2021, 10(1): 13962 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | backfat |
User inputs on reference #32811870
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
